ISSN versión impresa 2076-0531. ISSN versión electrónica 2076-054X
Oferta Laboral y Transferencias Condicionadas - Evidencias del Programa Tekopora
Resumen
Mediante el método Propensity Score Matching, el artículo evalúa los efectos del Programa de Transferencias Monetarias Condicionadas Tekoporã de Paraguay, en la oferta laboral de los participantes. Para el efecto, se utilizaron dos bases de datos de la Dirección General de Estadística, Encuestas y Censos (DGEEC) y se comparó los resultados de grupos de participantes con grupos de control.
El programa no tuvo efectos significativos en la oferta laboral. En lo que respecta a los adultos, esto implica que las transferencias percibidas no modifican sustancialmente al salario de reserva, para inducirlos a abandonar el mercado laboral. Por otro lado, la falta de efectos en el trabajo infantil significa que el programa es una herramienta insuficiente para reducirlo.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Angelucci, M. & O. Attanasio. (2009). Oportunidades: Program Effects on Consumption, Low Participation, and Methodological Issues. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(3), 479-506.
Angrist J. & J. Pischke. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.
Araujo, G., R. Ribeiro & H. Neder. (2010). Impactos do Programa Bolsa Família sobre o Trabalho de Crianças e Adolescentes Residentes na Área Urbana em 2006. Economia, 11(4), 57-102.
Attanasio, O. & A. Mesnard (2005). The Impact of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program on Consumption in Colombia.The Institute for Fiscal Studies, Report Summary Familias 02, London UK.
Attanasio, O., E. Fitzsimons, A. Gomez, M. Gutierrez, C. Meghir& A. Mesnard.(2010). Children's Schooling and Work in the Presence of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Rural Colombia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 181-210.
Bergolo, M. &G. Cruces (2014). Work Incentives and Welfare Programs. Evidence on Real and Reporting Effects, working paper.
Blundell, R. & M. Costa Dias. (2009). Alternative Approaches to Evaluation in Empirical Microeconomics. Journal of Human Resources, 44(3), 565-640.
Borraz, F. & N. González.(2009). Impact of the Uruguayan Conditional Cash Transfer Program. Cuadernos de Economía, 46, 243-271.
Campbell, D. (1969). Reforms as Experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4), 409.429.
Dearden, L., C. Emmerson, C. Frayne & C. Meghir. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers and School Dropout Rates. Journal of Human Resources, 44(4), 827-857.
Fischer R. (1935). The Design of Experiments. London, Oliver & Boyd.
Foguel, M. & R. Barros. (2010). The Effects of Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes on Adult Labour Supply: An Empirical Analysis Using a Time-Series-Cross-Section Sample of Brazilian Municipalities. Estudos Economicos, 40(2), 259–293.
Imbens, G. & J. Wooldridge. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86.
Khandker, S., G. Koolwal& H. Samad. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. World Bank.
Lee, D. & T. Lemieux. (2010). Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2), 281–355.
Martorano, B. & M. Sanfilippo. (2012). Innovative Features in Conditional Cash Transfers: An Impact Evaluation of Chile Solidario on Households and Children. UNICEF Innocenti Working Paper. 2012-03. Florence, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
Neyman, J. (1923). On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments: Essay on Principles, Section 9 (In Polish), Roczniki Nauk Roiniczych, Tom X, 1–51, Reprinted in English with Discussion in Statistical Science 1990, 5, 463–480.
Perez Ribas, R., F. Veras Soares, C. Teixeira, E. Silva & G. Hirata. (2011). Externality and Behavioural Change Effects of a Non-Randomized CCT programme: Heterogeneous Impact on the Demand for Health and Education. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. Working Paper 82.
Perova E. & R. Vakis. (2012). 5 years in Juntos: New Evidence on the Program’s Short and Long-term Impacts. Economía, 35(69), 53–82.
Rosenbaum, P. & D. Rubin. (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
Skoufias E. & V. Di Maro. (2008). Conditional Cash Transfers, Adult Work Incentives, and Poverty. Journal of Development Studies, 44(7), 935–960.
Soares, F., R. Ribas & G. Hirata. (2008). Achievements and Shortfalls of Conditional Cash Transfers: Impact Evaluation of Paraguay’s Tekoporã Programme. IPC Evaluation Note, No.3, International Poverty Centre.
Todd, J., P. Winters & T. Hertz. (2010). Conditional Cash Transfers and Agricultural Production: Lessons from the Oportunidades Experience in Mexico. Journal of Development Studies, 46(1), 39-67.
Wright, P. (1928). The Tariff on Animal and Vegetable Oils. New York, Macmillan.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Ruta 2 Mcal. Estigarribia Km 11
Facultad de Ciencias Economicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción
